Skip to content

PROCEDURE IN THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER

PROCEDURE IN THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER :

(i) Appointment of Commissioners

Section 20 as amended by the Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2009 provides that the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint any person who is or has been a member of a State Judicial Service for a period of not less than five years or is or has been for not less than five years an advocate or a pleader or is or has been a Gazetted Officer for not less than five years having educational qualifications and experience in personal management, human resource development and industrial relations to be a Commissioner for Employee’s Compensation for such area as may be specified in the notification. Where more than one Commissioner has been appointed for any area, the Government may by general or special order regulate the distribution of business between them.

Every Commissioner shall be deemed to be a public servant within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code. Section 20(3) empowers the Commissioner to appoint or choose any person, possessing special knowledge of any matter relevant to the matter under inquiry, to assist him in holding the inquiry.

(ii) Reference to Commissioner and his jurisdiction

Section 19(1) lays down jurisdiction of a Commissioner to entertain a claim in respect of payment of compensation to an employee. The Commissioner is empowered in default of an agreement to settle any question which may arise in any proceeding under this Act as to the liability of any person to pay compensation, and in particular, the Commissioner has jurisdiction over following matters:

(a) Liability of any person to pay compensation.

(b) Whether a person injured is or is not an employee?

(c) The nature and extent of disablement.

(d) The amount or duration of compensation.

If an application is made under the Employee’s Compensation Act to the Commissioner, he has, by virtue of Section 19(1) of the Act, jurisdiction to decide any question as to the liability of any person including an insurer to pay compensation. Section 19(2) further provides that the enforcement of that liability can only be made by him. The Commissioner’s jurisdiction is wide enough to decide the tenability of the objections; the consequential direction of the Commissioner to the insurer to pay is also covered under Section 19(1). In any event in execution of the order against the insured, namely, the employer, the Commissioner can enforce his liability against the insurer under Section 31. In the light of Section 19 read along with Section 31, the order of the Commissioner can never be challenged as being without jurisdiction (United India Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Kamalalshi, (1980) 2 LLJ 408).

(iii) Jurisdiction of Civil Court barred 

No Civil Court shall have jurisdiction to settle, decide or deal with any question which is by or under this Act required to be settled, decided or dealt with by a Commissioner or to enforce any liability incurred under this Act. [Section 19(2)] However, where the Commissioner has no jurisdiction to decide any matter and even fails to decide when raised, thereby leaving a party without any defence the Civil Court will have jurisdiction to entertain such suits (Madina Saheb v. Province of Madras, AIR1946 Mad. 113).

(iv) Venue of proceedings and transfer

Section 21 dealing with venue of proceedings and transfer of cases under the Act provides that:

(1) Where any matter under this Act is to be done by or before a Commissioner, the same shall, subject to the provisions of this Act and to any rules made hereunder, be done by or before the Commissioner for the area in which:

(a) the accident took place which resulted in the injury; or

(b) the employee or in case of his death, the dependent claiming the compensation ordinarily resides; or

(c) the employer has his registered office:

Provided that no matter shall be processed before or by a Commissioner, other than the Commissioner having jurisdiction over the area in which the accident took place, without his giving notice in the manner prescribed by the Central Government to the Commissioner having jurisdiction over the area and the State Government concerned:

Provided further that, where the employee, being the master of a ship or a seaman or the captain or a member of the crew of an aircraft or an employee in a motor vehicle or a company, meets with the accident outside India any such matter may be done by or before a Commissioner for the area in which the owner of agent of the ship, aircraft or motor vehicle resides or carries on business or the registered office of the company is situate, as the case may be.

(1A) If a Commissioner, other than the Commissioner with whom any money has been deposited under Section 8, proceeds with a matter under this Act, the former may for the proper disposal of the matter call for transfer of any records or money remaining with the latter and on receipt of such a request, he shall comply with the same.

(2) If a Commissioner is satisfied that any matter arising out of any proceedings pending before him can be more conveniently dealt with by any other Commissioner, whether in the same State or not, he may, subject to rules made under this Act, order such matter to be transferred to such other Commissioner either for report or for disposal, and, if he does so, shall forthwith transmit to such other Commissioner all documents relevant for the decision of such matter and, where the matter is transferred for disposal, shall also transmit in the prescribed manner any money remaining in his hands or invested by him for the benefit of any party to the proceedings:

Provided that the Commissioner shall not, where any party to the proceedings has appeared before him, make any order of transfer relating to the distribution among dependants of a lump sum without giving such party an opportunity of being heard.

(3) The Commissioner to whom any matter is so transferred shall, subject to rules made under this Act, inquire thereto and, if the matter was transferred for report, return his report thereon or, if the matter was transferred for disposal, continue the proceedings as if they had originally commenced before him.

(4) On receipt of a report from a Commissioner to whom any matter has been transferred for report under Subsection (2), the Commissioner by whom it was referred shall decide the matter referred in conformity with such report.

(5) The State Government may transfer any matter from any Commissioner appointed by it to any other Commissioner appointed by it.

The section deals with territorial jurisdiction of Commissioner under the Act. Further, for the first time the procedure for deciding case under the Act regarding accident having place outside India [second proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 21] has been provided for. This is further clear from the fact that a Commissioner can transfer the matter to another Commissioner under Section 21(2) of the Act under specified circumstances.

(v) Form of application

All claims for compensation subject to the provision of the Act shall be made to the Commissioner. But such applications other than the applications made by dependant or dependants can only be submitted when the parties have failed to settle the matter by agreement.

An Application to a Commissioner may be made in such form and shall be accompanied by such fee, if any, as may be prescribed and shall contain, in addition to any particulars which may be prescribed, the following particulars namely:

(a) a concise statement of the circumstances in which the application is made and the relief of order which the applicant claims;

(b) in the case of a claim for compensation against an employer, date of service of notice of the accident on the employer and, if such notice has not been served or has not been served in due time, the reason for such omission;

(c) the names and addresses of the parties; and

(d) except in the case of an application by dependents for compensation, a concise statement of the matters on which agreement has and of those on which agreement has not been come to.

If the applicant is illiterate or for any other reason is unable to furnish the required information in writing, the application shall, if the applicant so desires, be prepared under the direction of the Commissioner. (Section 22)

However, any defect in the application, e.g., when it is not in the prescribed form cannot be fatal to the claim. Any such irregularity can be rectified with the permission of the Commissioner at any stage (M.B. & G. Engineering Factory v. Bahadur Singh, AIR 1955 All 182).

(vi) Power of the Commissioner to require further deposit in case of fatal accident

Where the Commissioner is of the opinion that any sum deposited by the employer as compensation payable on the death of an employee, is insufficient, he is empowered to call upon, by a notice in writing stating his reasons, the employer to show cause why he should not make a further deposit within a stipulated period. If the employer fails to show cause to the satisfaction of the Commissioner, the Commissioner may make an award determining the total amount payable and requiring him to deposit the deficiency. (Section 22A)

(vii) Powers and procedure of Commissioners

The Commissioner shall have for the following purposes, all the powers of a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for the purpose of:

(a) taking evidence on oath;

(b) enforcing the attendance of witnesses; and

(c) compelling the production of documents and material objects.

Further, for all the purposes of Section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, he shall be deemed to be a Civil Court. (Section 23)

(viii) Appearance of parties 

Any appearance, application or act required to be made or done by any person before or to a Commissioner other than an appearance of a party which is required for the purpose of his examination as a witness, may be made or done on behalf of such person, by a legal practitioner or by an official of an Insurance Company or registered Trade Union or by an Inspector appointed under Section 8(1) of the Factories Act, 1948, or under Section 5(1) of the Mines Act, 1952 or by any other officer specified by the State Government in this behalf, authorised in writing by such person, or, with the permission of the Commissioner by any other person so
authorised. (Section 24)

(ix) Method of recording evidence

The Commissioner shall make a brief memorandum of the substance of the evidence of every witness as the examination of the witness proceeds, and such memorandum shall be written and signed by the Commissioner with his own hand and shall form a part of the record.

Provided that:

If the Commissioner is prevented from making such memorandum, he shall record the reason of his inability to do so and shall cause such memorandum to be made in writing from his dictation and shall sign the same and such memorandum shall form a part of the record.

Further, the evidence of any medical witness shall be taken down as nearby as may be word for word. (Section 25)

In the case of M.S.N. Co. Ltd. v. Mohd. Kunju, AIR 1956 Trav. Co. 935, it was held that the Commissioner should not make a medical certificate the basis of his award unless he has examined the concerned medical officer.

Time Limit for disposal of cases relating to compensation

A new Section 25A has been inserted by the Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2009 providing for the time Limit for disposal of cases relating to compensation. As per Section 25A, the Commissioner shall dispose of the matter relating to compensation within a period of three months from the date of reference and intimate the decision in respect thereof within the said period to the employee.

(x) Costs

All costs, incidental to any proceedings before a Commissioner, shall subject to rules made under this Act, be in the discretion of the Commissioner. (Section 26)

However, the Commissioner must use his discretion judiciously.

(xi) Power to submit cases

A Commissioner may, if he thinks fit, submit any question of law for the decision of the High Court and, if he does so, shall decide the question in conformity with such decision. (Section 27)

(xii) Registration of agreements

Section 28 makes it obligatory for the employer to send a memorandum to the Commissioner where amount of any lump sum payable as compensation has been settled by agreement:

(a) whether by way of redemption of a half-monthly payment or otherwise, or

(b) where an compensation has been settled as being payable to a woman or a person under a legal disability.

The Commissioner shall record the memorandum in a register in the prescribed manner, after he has satisfied himself as to its genuineness provided that the Commissioner has given at least 7 days notice to the parties concerned before recording such memorandum. The Commissioner may at any time rectify the register.

The Commissioner may refuse to register the memorandum on the following grounds:

(a) Inadequacy of the sum or amount settled; or

(b) Agreement obtained by fraud or undue influence or other improper means.

The Commissioner may in such a situation make such order including an order as to any sum already paid under the agreement, as he thinks just in the circumstances.

An agreement which has been registered as aforesaid shall be enforceable under this Act notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Contract Act, 1872, or in any other law for the time being in force.

(xiii) Effect of failure to register agreement

Where a memorandum of any agreement, the registration of which is required by Section 28 is not sent to the Commissioner as required by that Section, the employer shall be liable to pay the full amount of compensation which he is liable to pay under the provisions of this Act, and notwithstanding anything contained in the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 4, shall not unless the Commissioner otherwise directs, be entitled to deduct more than half of any amount paid to the employees by way of compensation whether under the agreement or otherwise. (Section 29)

 

Leave a Reply