Skip to content

Service of pure agent (Rule 33)

 Service of pure agent (Rule 33) :

Agency supplies are different from ‘pure agent’ in relation to valuation. This rule applies only to supply of services. It provides for the exclusion from valuation of any supply of certain costs and expenses if and only if the following tests are satisfied:

(i) the supplier acts as a pure agent of the recipient of the supply, when he makes the payment to the third party on authorisation by such recipient; the payment made by the pure agent on behalf of the recipient of supply has been separately indicated in the invoice issued by the pure agent to the recipient of service; and

(ii) the supplies procured by the pure agent from the third party as a pure agent of recipient of supply are in addition to the services he supplies on his own account. Explanation.- For the purposes of this rule, the expression “pure agent” means a person who-

(a) enters into a contractual agreement with the recipient of supply to act as his pure agent to incur expenditure or costs in the course of supply of goods or services or both;

(b) neither intends to hold nor holds any title to the goods or services or both so procured or supplied as pure agent of the recipient of supply;

(c) does not use for his own interest such goods or services so procured; and

(d) receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such goods or services in addition to the amount received for supply he provides on his own account.

Illustrations

a) Corporate services firm A is engaged to handle the legal work pertaining to the incorporation of Company B. Other than its service fees, A also recovers from B, registration fee and approval fee for the name of the company paid to the Registrar of Companies. The fees charged by the Registrar of Companies for the registration and approval of the name are compulsorily levied on B. A is merely acting as a pure agent in the payment of those f ees. Therefore, A’s recovery of such expenses is a disbursement and not part of the value of supply made by A to B.

(a) Ticket in railways is booked by a travel agent on behalf of the customer and the charges for such ticket are recovered by the agent along with the commission by showing them separately

(b) Customs duty, dock dues, transportation, port clearance charges etc. are paid by the customs broker on behalf of th importer and are recovered along with his commission from the importer

(c) Advertisement charges to the newspaper are paid by Advertising agency on behalf of the customer and are recovered separately along with commission

(d) In an ex-factory delivery contract, if the transportation charges are paid by the supplier on behalf of the recipient and are recovered separately from the recipient along with the price of the goods

To establish that the conditions of pure agent are getting satisfied, it is recommended that there should be a written contract between the supplier and the recipient. The clauses of the agreement should clearly point to compliance with all the conditions as discussed above with regard to pure agent. This will act as the most reasonable defense if any questions are raised by the Department later on. However, even if the contract is not in writing, it can be established by other available evidence that the conditions of pure agent are satisfied. However, any contract in writing may be considered as more persuasive in nature. Further, in order to claim any amount as a deduction in the form of a pure agent, the dealer will have to demonstrate with substantial evidence that the liability to incur the cost was on the recipient and that the dealer has incurred such cost merely for convenience sake. Further, the dealer has to ensure that the invoice/ bill of supply/ receipt has been received in the name of the recipient, who is the ultimate beneficiary.